is the military march from the marriage of figaro better than sex?

yes! it absolutely must be considered the greatest piece of music ever created. What an absolutely beyond magnificent, sublime piece of music it is. Just spent like almost two hours driving around listening to it over and over again super loud. That actually beats being in heaven in the afterlife in my books. Holy moley. Next to that, the Mona Lisa looks pretty pale, not so fancy. Words cannot express how great that piece of music is.

Moving on, Clinton was on nbc today show yesterday. Her favorite choice of literature seems pretty cool, the brothers karamazov, that is indeed a very excellent book. However, her campaign song 'lean on me' is atrocious. It's like she's saying, quit your job and collect social security. Not having absolutely anything against Mrs. Clinton in any way shape or form, all we can say is that she is going to have to get a serious foreign policy platform and elaborate it real quick because she doesn't seem to have one at all or know what one should look like.

Fiorina on the other hand, seems to have a very good idea. We'll see what Trump comes with when he releases his 'policy papers'. Clinton doesn't seem like she has a chance of winning the Presidential election the way she's going.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_pi%C3%B9_andrai


Russian incursion in Syria, nothing that nato, ash carter or spokespeople from the Obama administration have to say about it so far seems to be worth the trouble of mentioning. But if Russia does go ahead and put troops on the ground, they will eventually get targetted successfully with IEDs once they enter hostile territory. It's a pretty patchwork minefield out there so it would be very interesting to see if the Russian ground forces can work with local populations without getting blown up by locals wherever with IEDs. Moslems there absolutely hate seeing Christians or infidel westerners or Europeans mistreating their women. That's one thing the u.s. Army really got wrong, kicking down doors for late night searches, totally disrespecting the households, generally hating the locals, also pumping way too much money to their chosen favorites. That's the problem when mighty nations war with little nations. The Maoist communists were able to endear themselves to everyone on a local level due to treating people nicely. See also in Vietnam, America could have won there if they had a strategy of using tactical bombs which they never bothered to develop of drilling underground and destroying underground tunnel networks, that was the only way to win, disable the tunnels. It's unclear what objective the Russians have apart from prop up Assad. However, they are bombing American tanks won by Isis. Interesting to study the Russo Finnish war around world war 2 and how the Finns won there. If Russian soldiers go rubbing local people the wrong way they'll be getting their legs blown off and riding around in uber cabs after that in Russia. If they sit back trying to bolster Syria and Iranian and Lebanese shi-ites they could probably win back Syria for Assad but there's no great strategic interest there for Russia. Maybe just endearing themselves to Iran. Can't see their big interest but maybe they can alleviate suffering in the long run as opposed to causing more. They can definitely defeat Isil.