Quantum computing programming, understanding

 

Ok as mentioned in last post about quantum computing programming, we have the notation unit, kets and the standard chunk of data, the qubit. The qubit can be 0 and/or 1,....0,0...0,1,1,1

A 72 qubit computer is 2⁷², supposedly a number greater than the amount of stars in the observable universe. Where each galaxy averages approximately a trillion stars and there are over a trillion known galaxies. Fun fact, faraway galaxies travel away from us quicker than the speed of light which is an inconceivable notion brushed away in a childlike way by physicists. Notwithstanding the photon and the atom are considered to move at the speed of light which is considered to be the fastest speed except when considering galaxies faraway enough from us that appear to expand away quicker than the speed of light. Understand this before returning to imaginary number 'i' and Schrodinger's equation and the like....

97% of stars and galaxies are getting away from us quicker than the speed of light? Is it because of our extreme narcissistic ways and semi ape like pathetic nature as a collective human species, aforementioned Australian lesbian media included, or are the laws of physics to blame? Should we, like the mythical king of old have our lackeys whip the oceans in frustration?

https://youtu.be/cadNZJvfl7s?si=FJNuqFB5gADhCnVG

Imaginary number 'i' and Kepler's equation, finding a planet in its elliptical orbit:

https://youtube.com/shorts/BuljHijAK4o?si=3KKhnDaadUp8VyNQ

Off topic, just purchased and began perusing the following paper old fashioned book:

Marists and Melanesians A history of Catholic Missions in the Solomon islands. Hugh Laracy.

Excellent brief explanation of imaginary number 'i' 

https://youtube.com/shorts/qJnuZYFJdJg?si=-actGqrjnAgoFqd-

Mathematically, quantum computing seems to offer the exponential power of the number two squared and cubed and thus iterations to seventy two and beyond cubits. On the other hand, everything spherical appertains to living organisms, as opposed to rocks and crystals, etc. and anyway everything spherical seems to follow the same pattern of four over and over again:

i⁰ is one presumably 

i¹ is i

i² is -1

i³ is -i 

i⁴ is 1

i⁵ is i

Where i equals the square root of minus 1

i=√-1

So this is the familiar steering wheel location of quantum physics, always spinning from a centre to a circumference with radius one to negative one on the way axis to plus one. Each multiple of i basically giving us a 90 shift. 

Universally speaking this is like a God number where no matter if the universe is expanding or shrinking like the Hindus days and nights of Brahma, the 'laws of wisdom' as the Koran calls it, has the constancy to always produce a perfect sphere on scale of magnitude you name it (eg., D or Dilly, representing scale of magnitude). The perfect sphere obviously is cubed at some point but plotted two dimensionally we measure it in multiplies of i. 

Bro if I figure this shit out I'm nominating myself for a Benji award. Remember Fleetwood Mac just one the first ever Benji award pipping out Department of Homeland Security Diddy mansion raid (that mansion just burned down in the LA fires by the way), going the way of the proverbial (Barney the) dinosaur, also yet to win a Benji award, like Benji. (It's a negative i thing y'all).

Logic gates: 

One can think of each qubit as a sphere shaped thing like a planet in our solar system, the D (Dilly value being larger or smaller depending on the planet). Whether the pole points here or there like Neptune or Earth doesn't matter (would be polarisation concept imaginably) for the sake that true north is 0 and South is 1. Other locations on the sphere are called superpositions and are represented with greek letters for a and b.  The common superposition states are plus and minus states. Basically there are two values positive or negative that must add up to one. As per our power of one deal with imaginary number i.

Now, isn't this interesting. We just noted a moment ago that 97% of the light emitted from stars that we can see is coming from stars moving away from us quicker than that light travels to us. And look, at a TED talk on quantum computing it, they invite the TED audience ahead of time to choose circle and square where one is don't play and the other is flip heads or tails and the IBM quantum computer wins 97% and the audience 3%. As yet scientists seem to be chalking this up to 'interference' however the expanding motion of all known stars in the visible universes correlates to the electrons in these experiments perfectly so there must be some principle here.

TED

https://youtu.be/QuR969uMICM?si=yW-H6TIlonr3RCyV

(Want to nominate TED for a Benji? Comment on this blog post). 

Next day. Ok very interesting, there were originally all these questions about horizontal and vertical vibrations on the X,y plane something that is basically home in algebra. The questions depicted a white picket fence and a rope oscillating with questions like which orientation should vertical stake picket fence be showing for oscillating rope to continue oscillating while passing through slats. Amazingly a storm system came through and ripped a section of picket fence I have just as described in computer program. Amazingly the fence was ok but the two horizontal four by two inch beams were absolutely foldable like termites had been eating them forever and the wind that came through just tossed the little section of fence down like an angry child. Happily it was only nine vertical slats that needed reposting and after visiting our Australian version of Home Depot, Bunnings, I was lucky to get replacement beams yesterday at a staggeringly cheap $3.50 each AUD. Considering inflation, already a quantum miracle. Anyway I fixed it all today and the creature thing that menstruates who I buy pads for commented those beams need painting (like I wouldn't have known after doing all the hard work). Anyway great carpentry.

So anyway. That was the X,y plane of algebra, but the X,z plane of calculus is going three dimensional from the two dimensional X,y plane and here everything is superposition except Z(O) and opposite Z(1). These 0 and 1 are our traditional binary bits after we digitise everything. Now I'm going to need to label my black basketball to get this (that one's deflated anyway). Now any other state that Z (O) or opposite Z (1) is a superposition state which is mathematically defined with greek letters alpha and beta. Now we have to detour into the irrational number √2. Just when I thought the creatures that menstruate and those even of that species that don't menstruate, were irrational. Now we come back to the √2. We must stop and pause and give her attention, the fuggen shlut (√2, that is).

The square root of two is 99/70 as a fraction. In human terms it would be like considering Gutfeld as not a bitch, seemingly an irrational number.