There is a definite tendency to backwardness in Australian society, even before the Europeans arrived, the natives were backwards. Notwithstanding tremendous efforts at modernization, it appears the very continent itself exudes a kind of retardation that staggers the native flora and fauna, producing retardation. It appears many new humans and plants are brought to Australia and progressively, along with thriving, many of these specimens (of humans) go backwards.
I was once taken to task by an Australian about how Spaniards were not famous for anything. But in fact, I cannot think of any Australians famous for anything. Adulterous movie stars that can parrot American accents. Half baked scientists who kind of just produce nothing. Solidly left wing nutjobs academics. I'm not saying Australia is backwards, it's a solid little population of 27 million or so, but the culture is utterly appalling and there's no real patriotism as everyone is from everywhere and noone really even likes the monarchy much on many levels.
Comparing this with Spain, we have a nation strong willed enough that everyone south of the united states speaks Spanish, barring Brazil which is another Iberian manifestation of will to power with a language not dissimilar from surrounding northern Spanish provinces. Also many Americans speak Spanish or are Hispanic, Texas anyone? I mean obviously I was not going to argue with this aforementioned Australian as she wasn't even from an Australian background and had some kind of identity complex.
Anyway sometimes Australians bungle in drips and drabs, sometimes they actually get things right and do a smashing job, and sometimes they bungle like crazy. That's what we're seeing now play out in the Australian media. I mean before we get to the police investigation, I think it's important to realize that the Australian media is similar to Australian society in general: a hotbed of adultery. In fact the media are often proud of adultery and call it open relationships and swinging. Australians are fond of adopting child like magical thinking that just overlooks cheating and adultery so essentially you're dealing with a white population that lives in fantasy land. Often this is depressing and folks randomly suicide.
Anyone stepping in from Britain or the USA, if they weren't themselves some kind of rascal, would quickly smell rats the minute he or she turns Australian media on. Many big international names would no doubt struggle under the nepotistic, hedonistic, dumb English redneck weight of it. I think I have accurately described the thing. There are a few competent journalists floating around but obviously they aren't sexy enough for the utterly obnoxious, unbearable, troll like advertisers we suffer over here in this sparsely populated fantasy land of bumblers.
With regard to the Tyrrell police investigation, you generally expect a higher standard from the police than the media, I mean today's police have really evolved from the 1980s. There would be some really horrible kind of isolated country town cops dealing marijuana through their kids from impounded drugs or whatever, you wouldn't necessarily expect great things from local small town police in country NSW. But considering how big this case has become, it's only serving to highlight the grotesqueness of the media here, their utter insular, backslapping, dumb English redneck smugness, so obnoxious, such jerks, all kind of generally hostile to each other for the reasons I enumerated with devastating accuracy, like an F14 (F four Dean mate) laser painting its target, some scruffy looking Arabian shed, no match for Lockheed Martin.
Still, it's amazing, I repeat, that police are not at all investigating any of the cars suspiciously seen in the area, which would be the logical thing to do, but can only be done through regressive hypnosis of two separate witnesses. Instead police want to carry out a full forensic scrub of the property and surrounds. Well there's nothing wrong with a full forensic scrub but the lack of attention to the suspicious cars witnessed on the day tells you police care more about consulting 'psychics' (they do this regularly and then will ask you why you mess with the supernatural ???? huh?). Again, magical thinking as the psychotherapists tell you. And the media, being like the Queen's mentally challenged cousins locked out of view of the British public, immediately jump onto this magical thinking frenzy some dopey police are feeding out, implying the foster mom is guilty and harassing her will lead to a damming and accurate conviction. We saw this with Lindy Chamberlain and again the utter inability for mainstream Australian voices to represent truthfulness, regardless of their penchant for creative substitution of the word teen with dean. This, again, is because the society is riddled with adulterers, swingers, whoremongers, cheating wives, wives that screw their friends husbands, liars, and druggies of all stripes, homosexuals. Rascals. People that look down on everyone else from their rickety towers of false sekf righteousness. The scum of the earth. I feel sorry for this foster mom being harassed like that, at least she can keep her identity secret.
In Spain we say: patetico chaval, that means pathetic dude. That's what you're seeing. Still the truth is out there and noone is even talking to the eyewitness guy. He was so dopey himself he wouldn't even go straight to police with his witness. Ridiculous.
I guarantee that kid was kidnapped by some nasty inbreds or the like, probably from not far away and very likely through knowledge of some neighbor's of the foster grandmother that saw them around town with the kids. I strongly doubt the foster mother is involved and the main detective guy Jubelin said the same and he actually knew her. Get the FBI in look at who knew friends of friends that saw the foster grandparents around town with the kids. The entire area is plagued with paedos and maybe the foster parents didn't realize. We don't know.
Ok here's an opinion piece by another dopey dumb English redneck Australia coughed up: David Marr from the Guardian.
The Guardian: The church has always been in the business of shame – now it wants a law to protect its nastiness.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/nov/19/the-church-has-always-been-in-the-business-of-shame-now-it-wants-a-law-to-protect-its-nastines
By taking an extremely pro gay stance, David is able to single handedly bash the christian religion like its Goliath or something. Let's dive in deeper. As mentioned, David's position is essentially pro gay and my position relative to Australian matters is essentially pro reading books, anti adultery, anti dumb English redneck (so somewhat pro abbo but not in a way that promotes a soft bigotry of low expectations for abbos). I believe abbos can rise to the top. When an abbo friend tells me the word abbo is offensive I note how many time she uses it.
I recall when I went to university with these journalist 'elites', one of our student body was a gay chap at least thirty years old, who was allowed to show a film of a gay sex party he had organized. None of the self proclaimed christians in the student body made any complaint about it, neither did anyone else, most kids being only around 19 years old and uninclined to complain about risque behavior. Alternatively when I made a risque film, featuring not my homosexual buddies but an actual catwalk model (former roommate of Seal) and an attractive looking former marine who happened to be black, and had my actors dressed as nuns in habits, similarly noone complained. In fact, the gay guy Geoff and at least one of the openly lesbian girls probably enjoyed my film. None of the christian kids complained either, same as Geoff's flaming homo film. Interestingly, while Geoff's film was ho hum with the staff, my film raised red flags. Religion was not the issue, cancel culture was the issue. Cancel culture does not seek to destroy the christian religion or the homosexual faith.
Let's return to David's pro gay anti religion stance. First of all, sadly, for an anti religious stance, I do not see any concern about paedophile behavior in the church. The first concern anyone should have about the christian churches in the whole, is child protection. We realize as citizens most of our gay male friends do not want children to be harmed by paedophile monsters inside or outside of the church although frankly, as you can see from David's piece, it's not even a consideration. In fact, if I were to write about an anti religious discrimination legislation stance, I would not predicate it on how anti gay the church is, but calling the church out for hypocrisy and falsehood as seen by various glaring failures to protect children. Noone really can believe the poofies are being discriminated against anymore. In fact, noone in their right mind would even argue the poofies are any kind of force for good when it comes to protecting children from the poisonous culture of transgender self mutilation surgically alter your natural born gender ism. Sure I realize some guys are so devastatingly handsome you want to hump their legs like a horny dog, I get it. But stretching that into, let's bash the church and push our secular transgender freakshow agenda is just not 'cricket' as the dumb English rednecks (like David) of Australia say. Summarizing this last section on David Marr: go to hell poofies and paedos.
No comments:
Post a Comment