o'reilly divorce; what would W (dubya) do? (go fishing?)

hey frayns........... so last night, before withdrawing to sleep land......... very belatedly, spent some time reading about o'reilly and his divorce......... haven't really been considering o'reilly, in any way, shape or form, for very many moons now........ although maybe we'll start listening to his radio program again a little one of these days....... he does seem like a lovable character, and to average working joes, he is, essentially, a celebrity and a victim of that, in a sense, since being in the spotlight is always a double edged sword....... francis bacon has an outstanding essay on 'fame' in his 'essays' book.......note his writing style in this book is exactly the same as shakespeare's, since he, in fact, wrote those plays too........that's the truth

now being in the limelight, poor old o'reilly's dirty laundry is out there for whoever to read about........his former wife does look like quite a looker, one of these people born in the second half of the first seventh of the solar year (beginning around march 20) -- making her one of these sun type personalities..........very different to o'reilly who is a virgo type........... anyway -- both of them seem to be devout catholics and not sure what exactly is true that gawker is reporting about their situation........but it does get interesting with these celebrities and that's the price the public expects them to pay for their fame and special perks: for their lives to be an open book

now of course, reading all of these, and not withstanding any catholic issues the two are having --- o'reilly's wife remarried, apparently, by the way......... we weren't going to make this at all about jesus, however, there was an interesting question mentioned in one article that o'reilly asked george w (dubya), how he reconciled the death penalty with jesus' teachings.........

that's an interesting question, let's go there.... the gospels seem to mention that jesus applies the death penalty to a tree at some point because it doesn't give fruit.......... obviously this is a metaphor for the death penalty in some respects....... also, in the distasteful russian novel way of the gospels, as nietzsche describes them, there is the famous betrayel by judas........... jesus is not completely unaware that judas is a dangerous man and can throw a spanner into his plans for building a humanitarian movement for the advancement of human evolution and judas is even a close co-worker of his in this regard.......obviously judas is dangerous and obviously judas is interested for jesus to be stoned to death by jews or crucified by romans and jesus is not naive about this........all of this is about the death penalty and no-one is bumbling here according to the gospels.........judas is effective in handing jesus over to authorities, and it even seems, they cannot get their mitts on him without judas' help......... furthermore, maybe some half-arsed authorities there would be afraid that jesus would do something bad to them with his metaphysical powers.........anyway, o'reilly wrote about all this business in his book, killing jesus............. we cannot agree with papal history, or general european christianity in their interpretation of the outcome of the events..........the gospels say that the holy ghost appears on jesus during his baptism and then he expires it on the cross........... it does not say in the gospels that he physically dies on the cross, and if it does, it has been manipulated by some catholics or other early church fathers possibly around the 5th century........... what really happened is that joseph, a good, upstanding man and probably an egyptian initiate and a general mystical adept, receives the holy ghost upon baptism by john the baptist and gives up the holy ghost on the cross........... while he keeps the holy ghost between these two events, he has extra supernatural powers and is in direct relationship with some aspect of Godhead and able to perform amazing miracles (that really did happen) with complete surety........... in his Lord's Prayer, Jesus says that the Kingdom and the Glory is God's forever......... therefore we should not worship joseph as God as this is foolhardy and obnoxious..........neither while he is acting as Jesus is it correct to say that he is 'God' incarnate exactly........that's not right.......... anyway, don't know why we are mentioning this in regard to the death penalty and o'reilly's question to W, but suffice to say, the Jesus spirit, the holy ghost, is returned to God on the cross, which probably made the crucifiction a worse ordeal, and Joseph's buddies (Helios - his school - this does not refer to God at all, why would he lose faith in God, that's ridiculous), despite being late, are able to get him off the cross alive and he makes a speedy recovery

a lot of what is written in the gospels has been manipulated by the church before and during the dark ages in order to square a dogma that the church could use to manipulate the masses, this is why churches are wrong and maybe joseph smith and the mormons maybe were telling the truth, who knows?

anyway, about divorce, there is some stuff about that in the bible and also the book of mormon......apparently divorce is ok in case of sexual immorality? who the hell knows........... everyone is saying what would jesus do? but no-one is saying, what would the anti-christ do? what would W do? what would PT Barnum do? for example, what would W do? an old college friend approaches W, upon asking her about her marriage, W's friend reveals that her husband and herself are able to make their relationship work smoothly by making march a month of madness, march madness, as it were.......when asked what this madness entails by W, his friend replies that she can go to africa and hump all kinds of black dick all month long and post it all up on the internet and really commit some serious debauchery........her husband can do the same but prefers to go hot-air ballooning, in exchange for this march freedom, the two commit to respecting each others' marital wishes during the other eleven months of the year, picking up socks just so, following a schedule for cooking, child rearing, etc......... ergo, what would W do? what would he say to his old college friend, if anything? what would W do?

sorry, just being me